On Sparta (Penguin Classics)

Amidst all the contemporary historical deconstructionist prattling over the Spartans, the views and words of the more proximate historians among the ancients shine out like stars in a dark firmament. Plato and Aristotle had much to say of the Spartan constitution. Likewise did Plutarch, who was a later Greek historian living from 46-120 AD during the period of Roman Imperial ascendacy. In this book there is much instructive and readable biographical information on prominent Spartan lives, as well as explantions of culture and customs surrounding the "Laws of Lycurgus." There are Spartan tales and aphorisms as well and the inclusion of the tragic stories of the later reformers are invaluable inclusions taken from the perspective of time. They are archetypal stories of heroic-tragic figures who strive greatly to resurrect a noble but dying people and their way of life. I enjoy to ponder parallels between late Spartan reformer-Kings and the Roman Emperor Julian Apostate. Plutarch's book is required reading for students of Sparta. This edition is a good editing and compilation and the first version of Plutarch's writings on Sparta that I would recommend readers select.

Fantastic!! I’m learning so much and it’s also quite entertaining!

This book is a collection of some lives and excerpts from lives (or biographies) by Plutarch about Spartan kings. It provides a great deal of food for thought and I would recommend it. The book consists of roughly three parts: The first is a collection of biographies of Spartan kings (Lycurgas, etc). The Life of Lysander has been omitted because it is included in another Penguin edition. The second part consists of excerpts of Putarch's writings consisting of sayings which provide insight into Spartan life and culture. The third part is an appendix which includes some of Xenophon's notes about Sparta. The book allows us to ask a number of questions which may provide fruitful, such as the specific relationship between Spartan culture and Plato's ideas in "Republic." In general a lot of things in Republic that seem particularly contrary to the Athenian state are found in Sparta in this book. Perhaps this is why Plutarch places Lycurgus above Plato, saying that the latter wrote books on political theory but the former had invented them and put them in practice. These include descriptions of everything from female public nudity being equivalent to male public nudity to the idea that children should all be wards of the state and not the wards of their fathers. A great number of small details seem to be taken directly from Spartan life in Plato's work and this suggests that Plato, like Xenophon, was fundamentally more sympathetic to Sparta than to Athens. On the negative side, I agree that it would be good to have a more complete reference of Plutarch's references to Sparta in one volume. On the whole, this is an interesting book. 4 stars

Read this after "Achilles in Vietnam" as part of a command-directed recommended reading list. Was enlightening to see that even the most storied society of warriors was considered to be naive and difficult to deal with. Plutarch says, "The guardian class must always be deceived" and this philosophical 'deceit' on the part of the state towards the guardian class is an interesting concept to reflect upon - even if Plutarch gets it wrong about Lycurgus.

love the book and in good condition

I got this book in the library, read it, then went and bought it from the store. They only had one so I got this one online. Discusses Sparta and her laws from a late contemporary of the time. I use this as a basis for my own personal philosophy.

Himself a Greek, Plutarch was a witness of Spartan life first hand, but most of his accounts come from different sources. Well written book about a great civilization.

Informative and very well written. I can only recommend the book.

An eye opener on an exclusive ancient society,some of which are mind boggling,a book i will not get bored of.

Plutarch is simply one of the best ancient writers, with simple and engaging prose. No wonder so much of his original sources were lost because people would rather read and copy his works. Some merit is certainly due to the translator as well, which provides a nice introduction and context to each segment, as well as extensive notes and further bibliography on the topics. The book focuses on Sparta and its unique martial culture and leadership in Greece. To tell the story, it contains three biographies from some of its most illustrious leaders, a collection of quotes and sayings from Spartans and a summary of the unique customs of the city as perceived by other Greeks. The first (and most interesting) biography is from Lycurgus: the lawgiver, mythical figure that created the Spartan constitution and influenced the odd customs the city state is most famous for. Then there is Agesilaus, one of the Spartan kings at its height. A rather simple man, not raised to be king, both corrupt and capable military leader. It tells of the downfall of the Spartan hegemony in Greece in its conflicts with the Boeotian League leaded by Thebes. Finally, Agis and Cleomenes biographies, both reformers which tried to take Sparta back to its original constitution to save the city from the nobility corruption and stagnation brought by inequality, very similar to the Gracchi brothers of Rome. The first was felled during conflicts with the oligarchies of Sparta, the second lost its life amid the Successor Kingdoms politics, dying as a hostage in Ptolemaic Egypt after leading a brief recovery of Spartan power in the Peloponnese. The book finishes with sayings of Spartans and typical examples of laconism: brief witticisms used to justify the uniqueness of Sparta and its citizens. While they are most likely invented or retconned to explain past, they embody the image of Sparta that other Greeks had and that ended up forming our image of the Spartans: one that emphasizes courage, austere living, martial excellence and devotion of its citizens and families to the state. Many things surprised me throughout the book, with some interesting parallels to the present. It’s interesting to see how Lycurgus, the founding father of the Spartan constitution, was actually the amalgamation of different historical leaders and an ex-post justification for Spartan culture and (due to the deviation from the ordained constitution by him) its downfall as the preeminent city of Greece. The failure of Sparta to reform its political and economic system despite growing inequality, declining population and stagnant economy is also attested by a promise supposedly made by the people to him, a fact that carry strong symbolic meaning, even if unlikely to have happened. Speaking of tradition, it is also interesting to see how both sides of the political spectrum appeal to it to further their goals of reform: either to reinforce the oligarchical system in place or devolve more power to the kings. If you read Roman history you will feel at home with the recurring discussion on inequality, the reforms needed to curb it and how its fighting capability and moral quality of the citizens was affected by it. In the end, deep reforms seem to rarely go through without a significant breakup of the political order, which usually results in violence. Property also seemed to be linked to more freedom and broader political rights. Whenever it concentrated in the hands of a few, the system was liable to corruption, abuse of power by the elites and populists that promoted radical solutions and ended up concentrating political power.

Plutarch's book tells the immensely sad story of the relentless warring between the Greek City States: `Alas for Greece, how many men have you killed with your own hands.' His masterly brushed picture of Sparta is not less than astonishing. Sparta has been one of the purest communist States on earth. In order to stamp out arrogance, envy, crime, luxury, wealth and poverty among its citizens, the kings imposed redistribution of land, common messes for all Spartans, no free travel (foreign morals should be hidden) and no immigration (could be teachers of evil practices). Gold and silver coins were declared invalid and replaced by iron ones. Those who wanted to sin by amassing great wealth, needed vast granaries. Nepotism was impossible because children didn't privately belong to the fathers, but jointly by the city. Moreover, the city needed children from the best men (eugenics). Barbarous methods were used in the military education of the youth: thousands of human targets (helots) were killed in nightly survival exercises. The ultimate goal of the State was to create an army of bees swarming around their leaders and capable of defending Sparta's 4 villages against any outside enemy. For Plutarch, Sparta went under when it replaced its defence policies by offensive one: `empire and sovereignty war by force - unnecessary elements for maintaining the happy life of any State.' It was beaten by Epaminondas' Theban army. Sparta was the ideal State for Plato, of whom Plutarch adopted his anti-democratic reflexes: `those politicians, whose sights are set on glory, are servants of the crowd, even though they are called rulers.' This book is a must read for all those interested in the history of mankind.

This volume is a collection of books about Sparta . Every history in this volume gives to the reader a good panorama of what would be Spartiates. The characters are the best of elites warrior, heroes and kings but also common man. You also can find an appendix of Xenophon on the Costitution of Sparta or as the Spartans call it the Goods Laws. So you can understand why from the ancient times Sparta and his way of lives was so admired.

Awesome