Klipsch R-100SW 10" Subwoofer, Incredibly Deep Bass and an All-digital Amplifier,14 5" x 12 5" x 16 4"

Love this little guy, sounds nice and punchy for my small desktop Mac setup, just does a real good job of filling in the low end. I have a larger version for my home theater, it's a solid brand for the money. Also has a good look to it (yes large for a 10", and that's a very GOOD thing!).

Wow, what a difference! I had purchased an Onkyo receiver almost 2 years ago and connected an old set of Yamaha speakers to it and it was making due. The front, center and rears all work well and provide great sound, but the sub we had was a 6inch powered that just didn't deliver. Not sure if one of the kids kicked it or it just tore, but it was sounding horrible. Ordered this on a Wednesday night and got it Friday day! Problem solved! This 10inch is POWERFUL! I wanted to get the whole Klipsch set that Costco sells, but it's $1200+ so this is a perfect start and I can build the set over time and hopefully catch other speakers on deals. Very good quality from this company, definitely recommend for the price.

Have six of these in a 16x14 ft room with a 14” bass. Sounds great.

My second Klipsch sub. I have the larger one as well. For my large, open living area, this 10” more than fills the area with base. It’s smooth but can also punch hard. Great sound and price.

Our not very old Polk PSW505 died (apparently common) so I replaced it with this smaller Klipsch. This smaller Klipsch sounds better and has no problem filling 15x20 living room. Polk would rattle doors/windows but muddied sounds together. Definite upgrade.

I researched long and hard, tried out the Polk PSW10 and the Polk HTS SUB 10 BLK WAL, I can also compare it with the Bose Cinemate 15 acoustimass as well as the old $999 Bose speaker system I have. This is small, and that is awesome for those looking for a small sub. It does not look as good as the HTS Sub, but it sounds way better than the extra $40 you pay for this over the Polk. The Bose speakers are scientifically precise with the least boominess, especially the acoustimass with the $999 speakers. But they lack the warmth of even the cheapest Polk sub. I believe there is a whole range of frequencies lost somewhere between the mids and the lows in the Bose. Polk PSW10 is horrible in comparison to this speaker. If you can afford this one, forget about it. The Polk HTS is larger than the PSW10, sounds much better, and looks way more beautiful than this one with the grills on it. But, it suffers from the same boominess issue as the PSW10 which becomes a problem when you raise the volume of the sub. That is a problem because there are some songs where the bass is too boomy and if you reduce the sub volume, you basically loose the lows at such volumes - so what is the point? The Klipsch is not as warm as the polks, not as cold, stark and precise as the Bose, and yet are very nice speakers with way less boominess and you can increase the volume a lot before the boominess starts and even then it is not that bad. This makes me feel that there maybe subs at the next level which sound even better, but for my purposes I think this is more than adequate. For home theater this is perfect, for music, sure you will definitely be able to get better sub than this for more $$$. I would pay for a better sub than this if I am able to listen to music all the time, even when working and really obsessed with sound so much because I hear so much of it - I would go higher than this speaker. But for most normal people who come home from work, feel tired, want to chill out in the evenings and the weekend, this should be more than adequate. For sure, if your room/hall is very large then also I may go for something bigger. But for small/ medium size rooms this guy is more than adequate with low distortion for the price even at high volumes. I would buy this one, if you are looking for a reasonably good, sound not wanting to pay too much just for a sub. Update: I returned both and got two Klipsch R-110SW Subwoofer instead. It is only $75 more, and its price is more steady. The price on this one dropped since I got it. The reason I returned this eventually is because of comparison with my Bose acoustimass which has no boominess at all. So, even though this sub is very cute, very small and has much better sound than the Polk, it is still somewhat boomy which made a difference when there is a better one for just $75 more with a more stable price. The Klipsch R-110SW Subwoofer blows everything I have heard so far - wow! Super clear, no noise at all! There is a big, big difference - slightly bigger, way more heavier, but extremely low distortion. I’ll put my review of that sub on its page. I record in the studio, so it could just be that makes me more sensitive to distortion.

This Klipsch unit was number 3 on my short list of subwoofer choices. It came behind the Elac Debut 2.0 Subwoofer to pair with my Elac Debut 2.0 B2.6 (Amazon 1/21) which was on ebay as a cosmetically beaten up department store floor demo which I'm sure audio-wise got about as much attention as the wall moulding. The other was the JBL Sub 550p, a $600 machine on sale at Harmon for $200. This was a sealed cabinet, 50lb monster and I really lusted for it. Unfortunately, my funds finally came through 2 days after the Elac was sold and 1 day after the JBL's sale ended. Poor me, it was the Klipsch or nuthin'. As it happened, I was able to save myself a little $$$s by going for the Amazon reduced price option where I found a warehouse damaged item. It ended up being perfect and new in every important way. So as it turned out, poor me... nuthin'! Right out of the box this machine is a solid, imposing, impressive, almost monolithic piece of furniture. Set-up is easy as my HK 3490 Receiver has an RCA Sub Out. The Elac speakers are very inefficient at 86db sensitivity, so I set the gain dial at only 9:00 o'clock. The instructions advised 12:00 be the baseline vollume for a receiver hook-up like mine, but that turned out to be incorrect. At this point my understanding of LFE vs Line Level Output is still rather vague. I had also thought that a low crossover setting of 55-60 hz would suit the Elacs, rated for a 44hz low but I was wrong. I'm finding that 90 - 100 hz will still complement the speakers while supplementing their output, adding just a bit of low-end oomph. And after a short 10 day break-in period, I'm finding I'm really liking that bit of oomph with the cello of a Beethoven string quartet or the tympanic rolls of a Bartok concerto, instruments that I can now feel in the pit of my stomach.. But when I put on Romantic Warrior of Return To Forever or Imaginary Worlds of Sammy Figueroa and crank up the 120 wpc of the HK, the Klipsch, at present settings is more than enough force to knock me down and beat me up. Ahhhh....hurt me. To conclude, after break-in the bass on this unit is clean and tight and real powerful when you need it to be. At any of the Amazon pricings it represents an excellent buy and if you're looking for a sub for a medium range audio system it definitely merits your strong consideration. I'm certainly happy enough.

I've always been a Klipsch fan, and this sub does not disappoint. I'm not an audiophile, but this thing fills my 3-1/2 car garage with as much sound as I can handle. I'm really glad I spent the money on this thing because it was worth any penny.

the low bass beat punch from this little monster is just awesome...it gets to tapping your feet to any tune...M loving it

Excelente produto. Entrega muita potência. Acabamento impecável. Muito lindo. Se não tiver bem configurado incomoda devido à potencia absurda

AMPLIAMENTE RECOMENDABLE CON CALIDAD Y PRECIO.

It’s a Klipsch and it’s got low frequencies and all the shizz. Love it.

Not only great reviews on this sub, but also great sound. For a relatively small size, this sub gives a full and warm sound. Able to provide even a large room (55m2) with deep bass tones. Combined with my Marantz SR7013 and Monitor Audio Bronze 500 floorstanders makes the sound complete. Surprising for the money, but not surprising from Klipsch.