





We call the 569™ Loose Straight our modern, laid-back fit. These jeans sit low on your waist with a feel that's roomy, but not baggy, through the seat and thigh. And to finish things off? A classic straight leg.

J**.
Levi’s are perfect.
Excellent fit. My husband is very picky about jeans. They fit perfect. Colors were great and size was excellent. Great price and the materials is durable. There is some stretch to the jeans and the zipper works as it should. Very comfortable from the start.
B**N
Mens jeans
The Levi’s Men’s 569 Loose Straight Fit Jeans are a great pick if you like comfort with a relaxed look. They’re roomy without being sloppy, the denim feels durable, and they keep their shape well after washing. A solid everyday pair of jeans.
A**R
Favorite jeans
These are my favorite jeans. I don't like my jeans tight and these jeans are loose enough but not too loose. They are not too thick so feels very comfortable. These are the jeans I buy when I need new pants.
S**W
Nice Jeans, but not a "true 36 inseam....
So, first off, I've been wearing Levis' 569 since the 2010, back when they were TRULY LOOSE FIT STRAIGHT. Back around 2012, Levi's changed the cut of the 569s to fit more like "relaxed" straight instead of "loose" straight. I'm going to chalk this up to society's taste in clothing going "slim".Now about the jeans I just ordered. They are decent. The color is amazing. I love dark rinsed jeans. These are "looser" then some of the previous 569s that I've owned over the past couple of years. For that, I am immensely grateful. I will say that the denim itself is on the thinner side, feeling like I could catch a doorknob and tear a hole in them. So I'm going to 7 out of 10 on the fabric itself.Now for the sizing. I've always believed that the inseam should start, or be mesured where the inner pant leg seam and crotch meet. On my older 569s my 36 inseams were actually 36 at the bottom of the hem, when measured as I have done in the picture attached. These are about 34.5.Mind you, I am truly 6'6" barefoot, so my legs are long. I'm not sure what Levi's are doing, but they need to get it together.The jeans are long enough, and I'm pleased with them, and they were priced effectively so I'm going to keep them.Hopefully this review helps SOMEONE. I am satisfied with my purchse... with reservations of course. I'd buy them again at this price point tho.
A**R
Brand New with tags!
Came in brand new and wrap in plastic with tags. Great item, price and fast shipping.
C**L
Is as shown
Pretty comfortable tbh and fits how I want. Also fashionable would def recommend
A**R
True to size
Perfect fit!
D**N
Perfect fit, extremely comfortable material. Comparison against other jeans.
Perfect fit, extremely comfortable material. I had purchased two pair of Levi 569s (36x32) a few years ago and absolutely loved them, perfect for a male with moderately sized thighs/butt versus guys with chicken legs. I had since gained some weight in addition to having worn out the old jeans. While working towards reducing my waistline I decided to try a few other makes/models on my jeans to save some cash before putting down the extra cash for some quality Levi's. Short version, I should have stuck with the 569s because the 36x32s fit perfectly now as they did a few years ago, same cut and comfort. As I continue to reduce in waistline I'll stick with replacing to lower sized 569sComparisons:I first tried some less expensive pants, some Levi "Denizen" 236 & 285s 38x32s one of which I can button but is far too tight in the thigh area and the other I probably need to drop about 3 inches before they'll even button. For the Denizens it's probably just that my thigh and butt area is not the right size for that cut of jeans, to fit me properly I'd probably need to go up a few sizes but then would have a ridiculously loose waist. I guess both the straight leg and loose Denizens are meant for gentlemen with skinny legs/butts regardless of waist size. I then tried again in my quest to save cash some Wranglers. In the Wranglers a 38x32 fit my waist fine however due to the cut of the pants the thigh and butt area look like I'm wearing a few diapers and then some. In addition the material is course and not comfortable. So in my disappointment I went back and blind-ordered some 36x32 569s in hopes that they may fit better and I could not be any happier. The fit of these jeans gives plenty of room in the thigh and butt area and the material is extremely comfortable. Moving forward I will continue with the 569s as I reduce in waist size.
Trustpilot
2 weeks ago
2 weeks ago
2 days ago
3 weeks ago