

⌚ Elevate your wrist game with vintage tech and modern flair!
The Casio B650WC-5ADF unisex watch features a striking rose gold ion-plated stainless steel band and resin case, large digital display with LED backlight, 1/100-second stopwatch, daily alarm, and 50-meter water resistance. Lightweight at 63g and built for durability, it blends vintage aesthetics with practical, everyday functionality.








| ASIN | B07CJTRDTY |
| Batteries | 1 LR44 batteries required. (included) |
| Best Sellers Rank | #6,161 in Fashion ( See Top 100 in Fashion ) #115 in Men's Wrist Watches |
| Customer reviews | 4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars (1,087) |
| Date First Available | 21 June 2018 |
| Department | unisex |
| Item model number | B650WC-5ADF |
| Manufacturer | CASIO |
| Product Dimensions | 20.5 x 1.1 x 4.1 cm; 100 g |
D**G
Casio watch
Good quality nice
S**A
.
Happy to have it worth the money and the purchase was really good quality even before 12hrs i got my package
A**R
Great buy
Was in good condition and looking awesome.
R**L
Elegant and great quality
I bought this Casio rose gold watch for my girlfriend, and she really liked it. The design is elegant, the rose gold finish looks premium, and it’s comfortable to wear. Good build quality as expected from Casio and suitable for both daily use and occasions. Overall, great value for money and highly recommended.
P**M
Go for it
Love this... totally worth it..
N**A
Quality
Fine quality cz its casio
J**B
Very nice
Very good product
N**R
Good
Good looking
H**D
Original
S**M
Excellent watch.I really loved it.Look and quality is fully satisfied and worth of money
L**A
Praticidade e durabilidade 👍🏽
Z**A
The watch has a nice solid feel It about it. It feels quite heavy and large on my small wrist which is about 55mm across the wrist and 15cm circumference (female). The weight may be reduced by removing some links. Colour: Very nice rose-gold, like pale 'salmon'. I was unable to match the true colour on the photo. Overall, the colour is pleasing. My verdict: I was tempted to return the watch because it felt too large and bulky on my small wrist. Yet, after having worn it for a few hours during work, I decided to keep it and I am starting to like the look of the large watch. I also like that the face can be illuminated. For a more elegant look, for ladies with small wrists, I may recommend a smaller watch. I am quite tempted to purchase a smaller, stainless steel, ladies' watch for a more casual look. I have to say, my CASIO watches have never failed me. Dimensions, which I may have measured differently to the manufacturer’s: Stainless watch overall, across wrist, incl. extension for wristband attachments: 40mm Width along length of wrist: 37mm Display face: 20mm x 13mm Size of hour figures: 7mm Minute figures: 5mm Date figures: 3mm Band length with fixed catch: 70mm Band length with movable catch: 105mm Band width: 17mm Links: 6mm Weight with all band links: about 65g 65g does not appear ‘heavy’, but if one is not used to wearing a stainless-steel watch it ‘feels’ heavy and bulky to start with. The length of the links is ample for a larger wrist. Links may be removed by a service centre which would make the watch less 'heavy'. I also purchased the following watch for use on my camping trips: https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B00HFPIIOI?psc=1&ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_product_details This is a replacement for the same watch I’ve had for too many years to remember and which has never failed me (size comparison on photo below). The main reason I purchased a replacement was because the band on my ‘old’ watch broke (most likely material fatigue after years of swimming in chlorinated water, wearing the watch daily and not wiping it every now and then) It was quicker to purchase a new (and very cheap) watch than trying to hunt around for a replacement band.
E**O
Il colore dal vivo è bellissimo
Trustpilot
1 day ago
2 months ago